Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Dueling Krugmans

A comparison of the good doctor’s views on deficits and debt, 2003 vs. 2009. Which Krugman won the Nobel again?

Courtesy of Scrivner.net

4 comments:

  1. Krugman is without a doubt the most biased, partisan, bed-wetting leftist sycophant at the NY Times, and brother that's saying something. A couple of years ago on Neil Cavuto he was asked if there was anything about the Bush economy he liked. He could think of nothing of course. This guy is the poster boy for Marxist economic theory. When he adds 2 plus 2 he invariably comes up with 22, as long as 22 is consistent with redistribution of wealth. Furthermore, this is a very creepy individual. Even over electronic medium the vibe off this guy is Manson like. I guess all those gay guys at the Times read this as virility, I can't think of any other reason to keep him hanging around. His columns are a hodgepodge of Democratic talking points and bogus economics designed to confuse rather than enlighten and salve the souls of the faithful.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Krugman is a hack, this is damning.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Take a listen to a rarity, a Dem speaking honestly.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G44NCvNDLfc&feature=player_embedded

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for that video of Mike Rogers. He's a Democrat from Michigan talking like this? That's very strange but I'll tell you what, I'd vote for him. I never heard of the guy and I'd rather talk politics than have carnal knowledge with my wife (of course I rather watch a rerun of I Love Lucy than...eh, well you know).
    Anyway thanks again.

    ReplyDelete