As a late-20's conservative from the Midwest, I didn't realize I could care more about politics until I had a son. With "his" first presidential race coming up, there is a new desperation to do everything I can to ensure the country he grows up inspires in him the same awe it did for me as a child.
This is why we conservatives need to get serious. The Paris attacks were an act of war by an organization grown in the vacuum provided by successful enacting of bad leftist diplomatic theory. From Libya, to Ukraine, to Iraq, Russia, China, North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba - a systemic inability to demonstrate credibility has left the global order itself in question.
It is a failed policy of those informed by "fact checking" done by interns with campaign crib sheets or new-media journalists don't have an attention span longer than 5 years. It is a Vox foreign policy, and one we cannot afford for another 8 years. The GOP must nominate someone who is a capable and believable Head of State, who is a competent Commander and Chief. As conservatives who believe in small government, we inherently believe these duties to be the primary ones of the president.
Unfortunately, Trump is already seeing a bump. Ann Coulter claimed that the Paris Attacks were the night Donald Trump was elected. If she is right, if Trump is our nominee - conservatives will lose this election because the American people trust us on foreign policy and security, but watched us nominate a clown instead.
As a movement, we cannot take ourselves seriously if we then choose a candidate whose incompetence is a parallel to the superficiality of MSNBC, Salon, and Gawker. In a time when military and diplomatic decision making are increasingly important, the GOP front runner is a man who doesn't know the difference between a fighter and a bomber, can't name the legs of the nuclear triad are, and thinks he was in the military because of his boarding school. No surprise from a man who admits to getting his military advice from "watching shows." To those who mistakenly think he can negotiate his way out of putting our military at risk, he can't even identify who he has to negotiate with. Trump is the "Vox" candidate - a mile wide, but a neck-snapping inch deep if he's ever required to get any real work done for the nation. When this amateurism is given any more authority than blog post privileges, it gets people killed.
If conservatives plan to go on the offensive against the degradation and destruction of a global order built over decades, they cannot be afraid to go on the political offensive against Donald Trump. The GOP's silken-glove approach to the famously explosive tantrum thrower has allowed him to thrive in a permissive space. Trump voters are mad at a party that will not fight - and the Republican candidates allow Trump to thrive by permitting him to win fights he has conjured out of whole cloth.
Republicans can and must force Trump to fight in their territory - a national security landscape where he will stumble and fall. Republicans must unrelentingly reveal to Trump supporters, and to those sitting on the fence, the terrifying incompetence behind his empty rhetoric. Rand Paul showed how effective competent aggression can be against Trump when Trump wrongly announced that China was a signatory of the TPP. The GOP showed how not to combat Trump by ceding to his demands on debate time. Trump is supported because he can put on a guise of strength - his supporters will abandon him if the emperor is drawn too far out into the light in his "new clothes,"
Of course, this battle should be waged by only some of the Republican candidates. The longer Trump stays in front with only a 30% plurality of the vote, the longer he can maintain a façade of legitimacy. Roughly 70% of the Republican vote is currently split among 10 different candidates. If these candidates walked the talk, they would demonstrate the selflessness of Governor Romney, who preemptively ceded the field to newer leadership. Governor Jindal, wisely, chose to cede the field as Perry and Walker did before him. All worthy candidates who realized it was not their time. Meanwhile, Governor Bush is running a dead campaign, and attacking candidates with a chance of victory. Ted Cruz is courting Donald Trump, which is unbecoming of someone who values principled leadership. Governor Kasich, by all accounts a winning governor of a bellwether state, still plods along despite a less-enamored nation. Governor Christie is ruining renewed interest by decrying orphans (only Trump can get away with that stuff). Governor Huckabee is still campaigning for another TV show. These are all becoming or are no-chance campaigns. 7 years ago we laughed about "hope" not being a policy. We should apply the same standard to ourselves. Getting serious is to knowing when to be a member of the supporting cast and play for the team win.
If the GOP loses the election, which we will with Trump as nominee or after a political horse trade that will drive his former supporters from the voting booth, we cede another 8 years to decline. Secretary Clinton will face the same China, Russia, and Iran that bested her, and a terrorist organization she ignored. Whether the GOP wins will determine whether we, as a nation, have given up.
We have been playing a game, which is Trump's natural habitat as a casino magnate. However, this is real life - it is time to get serious.
Today, we welcome El Conservador to our stable of bloggers, specifically to get the perspective of a younger conservative. I have a feeling you will enjoy his work.
ReplyDeleteToday, we welcome El Conservador to our stable of bloggers, specifically to get the perspective of a younger conservative. I have a feeling you will enjoy his work.
ReplyDeletefirstly, welcome good to get another perspective.
ReplyDeletesecondly, on the jist of your article I for one would happily 'get serious' with the GOP if they 'got serious' on issues that their base actually cares about. Here are a few major examples where the serious GOPers are 180deg out of step with the unwashed rubes in flyover country (and I'm a short train ride from DC for crying out loud):
reauthorizing the import/export bank
fully funding obamacare
fully funding amnesty
turning the treaty clause on its head ala Iranian nuclear treaty
and taking the same side as democrats on immigration
I for one have held my nose and toes the party line a few times already and am basically done with it. Yet I keep hearing how we the people are ruining our own lot. No mas. How about the serious GOP do something for me, for once.
Welcome aboard. Sounds like you're gonna be a lot of fun.
ReplyDeleteBy the way El Conservador, the American people may trust Republicans on foreign policy (I sure hope so) but they absolutely DO NOT trust most Republicans with immigration. As events have proven in just the last week, you may have the greatest foreign policy team since Averell Harriman and John Foster Dulles, but it doesn't matter if your borders are wide open.
ReplyDeleteIf you can show me how Rubio's "Gang of Eight" bill would enhance America's national security, I'll send him a $1000.00 check today and put your name on the return address! THAT Sir is why Trump is doing well.
Trump is a symptom of the cancer that riddles Washington. Government has gotten away from us. A professional political class has taken root and it's time it was rooted out. The last true "outsider" we've had as President was Ronald Reagan. He's was ideological, he was tough and he was committed to winning, not just getting along and "governing". Trumps unashamedly blunt personality is a counterpoint to the bullshitting bullshitters we've had foisted upon us for over 25 years.
I don't know if Trump will win or not, but I know there are many establishment Republicans who are more than willing to throw Trump overboard in favor of Hillary. That Sir will be the death of the Party, not Trump winning. You sound like one of those guys. I urge you to rethink your distaste for Trump. Like him or not he's one of ours.
Excellent post. Trump is a clown. But Hammer is right. Whether one likes it or not, this is an anti-immigration moment on the right, and the winning Republican nominee will embrace that sentiment whether he or she shares it, deep down. There are, of course, many ways to do that without coming off as anti-Latino, and the winner of the general election will need to do that.
ReplyDelete