Monday, September 22, 2008

Who is to Blame? VDH gets it right

I reprint Victor Davis Hanson's entry from today's "Corner" blog at National Review in its entirety. VDH is one of my favorite thinkers.

"In the sudden rush to blame the crooks in DC and on Wall Street, we should first take a long look in the mirror. For two decades, we — as in we Americans — expected to buy homes, flip them, and walk away with thousands — without much thought about what might happen to the johnny-come-lately at the bottom of the pyramid when the game was finally up and housing prices cooled or crashed. Walking away from a mortgage on a house with negative equity was "smart;" putting someone in one who had no ability to come up with a down payment, monthly payments, taxes, and maintenance was "fair"; borrowing unduly against equity for cash expenditures was "understandable."

We deified the masters of hedge funds, derivatives, and subprime mortgages, forgetting that passé oil production, mining, farming, manufacturing, engineering and construction were the real sources of our material wealth.

We assumed mega-returns on our portfolios, without a thought what Wall Street did to get them, or the effect on others who needed to borrow at such high interest to run their businessess.

Ours became a culture that wanted larger cars but less drilling to fuel them, more stuff and more credit from — and more anger at — the Chinese; less taxes but even more government hand-outs; ever more electricity, but fewer icky coal and nuclear plants — and always more health-care, education-care, prescription drug-care, housing-care, and always less care how to pay for it.

So by all means let us prosecute the lawbreakers, finger-point at the enablers, lecture the stupid, but at least spare us the sanctimonious "they" did this to poor "us." If there were not a Senate Banking Chairman like Chris Dodd without shame cozing up to the creeps at Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, or a Richard Fuld playing casino roulette with someone else's money, we would have had to invent them.

We should argue over the course of Paulson's unpleasant chemotherapy to deal with these symptoms of a metastasizing disease, but let us at least consider what were the catalysts for that deeper cancer."

6 comments:

  1. EXACTLY!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. The man deserves an expert marksmanship badge for hitting the cause of the problem dead center.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't believe I've ever witnessed such an expertly-delivered public spanking (of the entire public). Phil Graham is probably wishing he had taken an elective course from this guy before he attempted something similar with his "nation of whiners" pronouncement.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I doubt that these Wall Street firms are guilty of criminal offenses but they most certainly failed in their duty to shareholders. A person may apply for a loan with no proof of income but that does not mean they should be given one. The banks that threw caution to the wind in pursuit of profit deserve to go under. I would rather see Wall St go down in flames right now then have 700 Billion added to the debt. Who is going to pay for it? We are, through higher taxes that reap nothing in return. If I was McCain I would throw in the towel now because the next four years are going to suck for the President.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I wonder where the $700B figure comes in. Does this assume that the Feds buy all this debt and then are unable to sell any of it when housing prices rebound? Isn't there just a teensy chance the Feds can get some of this money back?

    ReplyDelete