He explained why he is against the Teacher's union, but he didn't convince me he is for the kids. He basically said, "by ensuring the teacher's union is stripped of it's current power, kids will get a better education." Where is the correlation between these two points? His speach showed a no nonsense, don't mess with me kind of leadership (which clearly appeals to you), but his logic was vague and incomplete.
I love that fat bastard.
ReplyDeleteI love the guy too, but doesn't he strike you as taking a little too much glee in being combative? I still think Mitch Daniels is our man.
ReplyDeleteHe's combative, he's passionate, he is emotionally connected to what he is doing, and he did not go to Harvard law.
ReplyDeleteHe explained why he is against the Teacher's union, but he didn't convince me he is for the kids. He basically said, "by ensuring the teacher's union is stripped of it's current power, kids will get a better education." Where is the correlation between these two points? His speach showed a no nonsense, don't mess with me kind of leadership (which clearly appeals to you), but his logic was vague and incomplete.
ReplyDeleteIt's a 4:42 clip. I suspect he's made that case elsewhere.
ReplyDelete