As someone recently told me, the surest sign that a liberal is in trouble during a debate is how quickly they resort to playing the Nazi card (or the race card, or the global warming denier card, etc.).
It took Nancy Pelosi all of 16 seconds. Not too shabby.
Not one to be outdone, Senator Barbara Boxer follows up with an impassioned if incoherent defense of the President, accusing “well-dressed” protesters at town-hall meetings of a concerted effort to hurt Obama politically.
A moonbat two 'fer.
Thursday, August 6, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Well I'll be a monkey's uncle. I thought that the German word for ACORN was "shutzstaffel". Turns out it's actually "Eichel".
Have we come to this? Someone like Barbara Boxer can be a Senator. Calhoun, Clay and Webster must be spinning in their graves.
I make that judgment not based on differing political philosophies but on the basis of intellect. The woman is an idiot. She's an arrogant, clueless pain in the ass and the people of California should be ashamed.
Godwin's Law: "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.”
There is a tradition in many groups that, once this occurs, that thread is over, and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument was in progress.
Pelosi/Boxer - Epic Fail
"Pelosi/Boxer - Epic Fail"
Doc - That's SENATOR Boxer. And do NOT call her "Ma'am". She worked so hard to get that title.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrpFSfpXD50
I'm confused...is Boxer suggesting that Democrats are poor dressers?
Am I to believe that only people who are sartorially challenged are to be considered as genuine citizens with a legitimate complaint?
Or are they saying that their supporters dress like slobs?
And just where to "cross-dressers" fall in her broad-brush characterization? My guess is squarely in her camp.
Post a Comment