I'm not so quick to give Marx a pass on the sins of communism. Marx, as brilliant as he was, had to know man would not evolve through heightened awareness (or whatever) into a selfless automaton dutifully working for the greater good of greater mankind. He had to know the "dictatorship of the proletariat" would inevitably turn into a bloodbath and the exact opposite of the classless utopia he envisioned. I sometimes think he was a brilliant thinker looking for that grand theory that would justify him sponging off Engles and the rest.
When Marx wrote "from each according to his ability,to each according to his needs", do you think he ever saw the day when a member of society wouldn't become productive until his 23rd year or so? Do you think he ever foresaw people retiring at 65 and enjoying both a check and healthcare benefits (make that 55 and half pay for gubmint employees) for the next 15 - 20 years? Do you think he'd look today and say, "No wonder your all broke."
The Blog: A compendium of thoughts on politics, world affairs, economics, pop culture and social issues, from the center right perspective of me--Bryan McGrath--a University of Virginia graduate who spent a career in the world's greatest Navy keeping my mouth shut about politics and social issues (ok, publicly keeping it shut). Those days are over! Pull up a chair and chime in where you will. Keep it clean, civil, concise and relevant.
The Fish: The fish is a "coat of arms" for the blog, symbolizing three formative influences in the life of the blog founder. The first is his experience at the University of Virginia--symbolized most importantly by the fish itself, or a caricature of a "Wahoo", the fish we have acquired as an informal nickname. Additionally there is the sword, the sword of a Cavalier. It is not wielded in a threatening manner, as this is a civil blog. But it is there, should it be needed. Thirdly, there is the influence of 21 years in the Navy--symbolized by the anchor on the Wahoo's fin (and again, the sword) . Finally, there is the bowler, tuxedo, and monocle, symbols of a refined, intellectual conservatism, or what I seek to encourage here.
The Policy: I take FULL responsibility for what I write. I will not be held responsible for the content of my comments section--as long as it is civil and passes my own inscrutable sniff tests, it will appear. If the comment offends you, that is on you.
Feedjit
Follow Me:
On Twitter at ConsWahoo On Facebook at "Fans of The Conservative Wahoo"
3 comments:
Loved him in 'A Night At The Opera'.
I'm not so quick to give Marx a pass on the sins of communism. Marx, as brilliant as he was, had to know man would not evolve through heightened awareness (or whatever) into a selfless automaton dutifully working for the greater good of greater mankind. He had to know the "dictatorship of the proletariat" would inevitably turn into a bloodbath and the exact opposite of the classless utopia he envisioned.
I sometimes think he was a brilliant thinker looking for that grand theory that would justify him sponging off Engles and the rest.
When Marx wrote "from each according to his ability,to each according to his needs", do you think he ever saw the day when a member of society wouldn't become productive until his 23rd year or so? Do you think he ever foresaw people retiring at 65 and enjoying both a check and healthcare benefits (make that 55 and half pay for gubmint employees) for the next 15 - 20 years? Do you think he'd look today and say, "No wonder your all broke."
Post a Comment