CW I'm a little surprised you thought all along Obama would be re-elected. It's true Democrats have built in advantages and Obama had the bully pulpit, but Republicans are not without a few advantages as well, maybe the biggest of advantages. And that is the economy stinks. Folks are hurting and no amount of propaganda can change that fact or convince people otherwise. And it's hard to sell the same "hope and change" bullshit twice.
My thinking was the day Obama was elected this would be a replay of 1980. I saw Carter elected in 1976 with much the same campaign theme(s) as Obama (you know this amorphous, ambiguous, all things to all people crap when nobody really had any idea what the guy was about). I thought, again the day he was elected that Obama was at least as left wing as Carter, and as it turns out more so. After four years the economy would be a mess, foreign policy would be a mess and frankly we'd be lucky to survive considering he had both houses of Congress. But if we did make it, I knew that if the Republicans ran a good competent candidate it would probably be a landslide. That remains to be seen but it appears increasingly likely.
But I have to admit I was getting a little nervous. A month or so ago I thought I might be falling into the "rich Manhattan liberal" trap. Remember that? In 1972 a New Yorker was complaining " I don't know how Nixon won, I don't know anybody who voted for him". Tickbiters tend not to be liberals, so maybe I was insulated from what was really happening. Maybe the country had changed enough both demographically and in terms of values and I just hadn't noticed. Maybe I was deluding myself.
But I kept waiting and hoping for Romney to go over the heads of the press and make his case to the American people. And by golly that's just what he did in the first debate. For every positive impression made by Romney, there was a corresponding negative for Obama. Obama positioned Romney as part Gordon Gekko part Cotton Mather. When that malicious construct fell, so did Obama. He showed himself to be a small minded, dishonest, shallow, intellectually deficient Chicago machine politician. No more no less. And as did everybody else, I knew then it was over.
The Blog: A compendium of thoughts on politics, world affairs, economics, pop culture and social issues, from the center right perspective of me--Bryan McGrath--a University of Virginia graduate who spent a career in the world's greatest Navy keeping my mouth shut about politics and social issues (ok, publicly keeping it shut). Those days are over! Pull up a chair and chime in where you will. Keep it clean, civil, concise and relevant.
The Fish: The fish is a "coat of arms" for the blog, symbolizing three formative influences in the life of the blog founder. The first is his experience at the University of Virginia--symbolized most importantly by the fish itself, or a caricature of a "Wahoo", the fish we have acquired as an informal nickname. Additionally there is the sword, the sword of a Cavalier. It is not wielded in a threatening manner, as this is a civil blog. But it is there, should it be needed. Thirdly, there is the influence of 21 years in the Navy--symbolized by the anchor on the Wahoo's fin (and again, the sword) . Finally, there is the bowler, tuxedo, and monocle, symbols of a refined, intellectual conservatism, or what I seek to encourage here.
The Policy: I take FULL responsibility for what I write. I will not be held responsible for the content of my comments section--as long as it is civil and passes my own inscrutable sniff tests, it will appear. If the comment offends you, that is on you.
Feedjit
Follow Me:
On Twitter at ConsWahoo On Facebook at "Fans of The Conservative Wahoo"
1 comment:
CW I'm a little surprised you thought all along Obama would be re-elected. It's true Democrats have built in advantages and Obama had the bully pulpit, but Republicans are not without a few advantages as well, maybe the biggest of advantages. And that is the economy stinks. Folks are hurting and no amount of propaganda can change that fact or convince people otherwise. And it's hard to sell the same "hope and change" bullshit twice.
My thinking was the day Obama was elected this would be a replay of 1980. I saw Carter elected in 1976 with much the same campaign theme(s) as Obama (you know this amorphous, ambiguous, all things to all people crap when nobody really had any idea what the guy was about). I thought, again the day he was elected that Obama was at least as left wing as Carter, and as it turns out more so. After four years the economy would be a mess, foreign policy would be a mess and frankly we'd be lucky to survive considering he had both houses of Congress. But if we did make it, I knew that if the Republicans ran a good competent candidate it would probably be a landslide. That remains to be seen but it appears increasingly likely.
But I have to admit I was getting a little nervous. A month or so ago I thought I might be falling into the "rich Manhattan liberal" trap. Remember that? In 1972 a New Yorker was complaining " I don't know how Nixon won, I don't know anybody who voted for him". Tickbiters tend not to be liberals, so maybe I was insulated from what was really happening. Maybe the country had changed enough both demographically and in terms of values and I just hadn't noticed. Maybe I was deluding myself.
But I kept waiting and hoping for Romney to go over the heads of the press and make his case to the American people. And by golly that's just what he did in the first debate. For every positive impression made by Romney, there was a corresponding negative for Obama. Obama positioned Romney as part Gordon Gekko part Cotton Mather. When that malicious construct fell, so did Obama. He showed himself to be a small minded, dishonest, shallow, intellectually deficient Chicago machine politician. No more no less. And as did everybody else, I knew then it was over.
Post a Comment