Krugman is without a doubt the most biased, partisan, bed-wetting leftist sycophant at the NY Times, and brother that's saying something. A couple of years ago on Neil Cavuto he was asked if there was anything about the Bush economy he liked. He could think of nothing of course. This guy is the poster boy for Marxist economic theory. When he adds 2 plus 2 he invariably comes up with 22, as long as 22 is consistent with redistribution of wealth. Furthermore, this is a very creepy individual. Even over electronic medium the vibe off this guy is Manson like. I guess all those gay guys at the Times read this as virility, I can't think of any other reason to keep him hanging around. His columns are a hodgepodge of Democratic talking points and bogus economics designed to confuse rather than enlighten and salve the souls of the faithful.
Thanks for that video of Mike Rogers. He's a Democrat from Michigan talking like this? That's very strange but I'll tell you what, I'd vote for him. I never heard of the guy and I'd rather talk politics than have carnal knowledge with my wife (of course I rather watch a rerun of I Love Lucy than...eh, well you know). Anyway thanks again.
The Blog: A compendium of thoughts on politics, world affairs, economics, pop culture and social issues, from the center right perspective of me--Bryan McGrath--a University of Virginia graduate who spent a career in the world's greatest Navy keeping my mouth shut about politics and social issues (ok, publicly keeping it shut). Those days are over! Pull up a chair and chime in where you will. Keep it clean, civil, concise and relevant.
The Fish: The fish is a "coat of arms" for the blog, symbolizing three formative influences in the life of the blog founder. The first is his experience at the University of Virginia--symbolized most importantly by the fish itself, or a caricature of a "Wahoo", the fish we have acquired as an informal nickname. Additionally there is the sword, the sword of a Cavalier. It is not wielded in a threatening manner, as this is a civil blog. But it is there, should it be needed. Thirdly, there is the influence of 21 years in the Navy--symbolized by the anchor on the Wahoo's fin (and again, the sword) . Finally, there is the bowler, tuxedo, and monocle, symbols of a refined, intellectual conservatism, or what I seek to encourage here.
The Policy: I take FULL responsibility for what I write. I will not be held responsible for the content of my comments section--as long as it is civil and passes my own inscrutable sniff tests, it will appear. If the comment offends you, that is on you.
Feedjit
Follow Me:
On Twitter at ConsWahoo On Facebook at "Fans of The Conservative Wahoo"
4 comments:
Krugman is without a doubt the most biased, partisan, bed-wetting leftist sycophant at the NY Times, and brother that's saying something. A couple of years ago on Neil Cavuto he was asked if there was anything about the Bush economy he liked. He could think of nothing of course. This guy is the poster boy for Marxist economic theory. When he adds 2 plus 2 he invariably comes up with 22, as long as 22 is consistent with redistribution of wealth. Furthermore, this is a very creepy individual. Even over electronic medium the vibe off this guy is Manson like. I guess all those gay guys at the Times read this as virility, I can't think of any other reason to keep him hanging around. His columns are a hodgepodge of Democratic talking points and bogus economics designed to confuse rather than enlighten and salve the souls of the faithful.
Krugman is a hack, this is damning.
Take a listen to a rarity, a Dem speaking honestly.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G44NCvNDLfc&feature=player_embedded
Thanks for that video of Mike Rogers. He's a Democrat from Michigan talking like this? That's very strange but I'll tell you what, I'd vote for him. I never heard of the guy and I'd rather talk politics than have carnal knowledge with my wife (of course I rather watch a rerun of I Love Lucy than...eh, well you know).
Anyway thanks again.
Post a Comment