I am in favor of free speech. Bring it on. For real human beings, in whom the Creator endowed inalienable rights, to quote Mr. Jefferson. Corporations are not real human beings. They are legal fictions designed to accomplish useful ends for society. I don't think that corporate participation in free speech political debates is one of those useful ends. I think Congress should strip corporations of this particular legal personhood ( justified by a footnote in a 19th century Supreme Court ruling) and limit corporations to the useful commercial functions they provide for us.
The "Press" is also not a real human being. It is an assemblage of human beings, and that assemblage not only enjoys the freedom of speech, it enjoys a very special status of freedom of speech.
The framers granted citizens the right to peaceably assemble. Am I to take it that you believe that when such an assemblage meets and acts with purpose and unity--it somehow loses the collective protections it enjoyed under the Bill of Rights?
Corporations are just such an assemblage. A corporation has interests, and those interests deserve the same protections that would extend to any of the individuals within it. I'll post this same answer on Facebook.
The Blog: A compendium of thoughts on politics, world affairs, economics, pop culture and social issues, from the center right perspective of me--Bryan McGrath--a University of Virginia graduate who spent a career in the world's greatest Navy keeping my mouth shut about politics and social issues (ok, publicly keeping it shut). Those days are over! Pull up a chair and chime in where you will. Keep it clean, civil, concise and relevant.
The Fish: The fish is a "coat of arms" for the blog, symbolizing three formative influences in the life of the blog founder. The first is his experience at the University of Virginia--symbolized most importantly by the fish itself, or a caricature of a "Wahoo", the fish we have acquired as an informal nickname. Additionally there is the sword, the sword of a Cavalier. It is not wielded in a threatening manner, as this is a civil blog. But it is there, should it be needed. Thirdly, there is the influence of 21 years in the Navy--symbolized by the anchor on the Wahoo's fin (and again, the sword) . Finally, there is the bowler, tuxedo, and monocle, symbols of a refined, intellectual conservatism, or what I seek to encourage here.
The Policy: I take FULL responsibility for what I write. I will not be held responsible for the content of my comments section--as long as it is civil and passes my own inscrutable sniff tests, it will appear. If the comment offends you, that is on you.
Feedjit
Follow Me:
On Twitter at ConsWahoo On Facebook at "Fans of The Conservative Wahoo"
3 comments:
Damn it has been a VERY good week.
I am in favor of free speech. Bring it on. For real human beings, in whom the Creator endowed inalienable rights, to quote Mr. Jefferson. Corporations are not real human beings. They are legal fictions designed to accomplish useful ends for society. I don't think that corporate participation in free speech political debates is one of those useful ends. I think Congress should strip corporations of this particular legal personhood ( justified by a footnote in a 19th century Supreme Court ruling) and limit corporations to the useful commercial functions they provide for us.
The "Press" is also not a real human being. It is an assemblage of human beings, and that assemblage not only enjoys the freedom of speech, it enjoys a very special status of freedom of speech.
The framers granted citizens the right to peaceably assemble. Am I to take it that you believe that when such an assemblage meets and acts with purpose and unity--it somehow loses the collective protections it enjoyed under the Bill of Rights?
Corporations are just such an assemblage. A corporation has interests, and those interests deserve the same protections that would extend to any of the individuals within it. I'll post this same answer on Facebook.
Post a Comment