The debate last night was a bit soporific at times. One reason for that is the subject matter for most of the evening had been covered ad nauseum over the last nine or so months. The other reason was the audience was asked to hold their applause. Personally, I thought it was a welcome break from the raucous crowds we've been treated to in the past.
But it had another advantage-it knocked Newt a bit off his game. He seemed subdued without the support of the crowd; even some of his lines seemed to pause for an expected audience roar of approval.
Clearly Newt recognizes his unexciting (but to be fair, still solid) performance, in great contrast to his last two debate performances when he had a little help from Juan Williams and John King. So on Fox and Friends this morning, Newt made the threat that he may not participate in future debates if the crowd can't get involved. Yeah, right Newt.
Seems Speaker Gingrich is terribly concerned about the free speech rights of the audience. Wonder if he'd feel that way if he didn't need them so much to egg him on.
Posts
6 comments:
You got something against hooting and hollering?
Can't demagogue without the demos...
No dear. But I appreciated the solemnity of the debate hall. This is a serious moment, let's have a serious environment without the pep rally feel.
Yes lets keep it quiet. We don't want to get a feel of what the audience is thinking.
I get your point but if South Carolina folks want to treat it like Clemson vs. South Carolina then so be it.
By the way, should Congress be required to sit on their hands tonight?
Wouldn't it be nice if they DID sit on their hands? It would make this load of crap go a lot faster. I've just about had enough already.
Post a Comment