That's what they're going to run on from here on out, social issues, immigration, anything but the economy. And it might work. They're trying to mitigate the pain of unemployment with extension after extension of benefits (my State has borrowed 2 billion plus for that very thing) but they're just kicking the can down the road. I'm not sure how I feel about the midterms. If the Republicans do very well, and we start to see sane fiscal policy and an improved economy, Obama like Clinton could get the credit. I want socialism once and for all discredited with the brain-dead, any breeze will sway you, moderates (otherwise know as fools, idiots and no-nothings)!
Dionne pretty much nails my position on social issues and conservative philosphy. Kudo's for posting it. I've never really understood the conservtives postion on things such as family values, gay marriage or abortion. And it seems as if every day brings out another "one man, one woman" politician who does not fully comprehend the "one woman" part of that ideology.
When my wife became pregnant with my daughter she was 22 years old, working, and still in college. We were neither financially nor emotionally prepared for a newborn. Ultimately we choose to have a baby, and take on all of the responsibility that came along with it.
It was the most difficult decision we have ever had to make. Two years later we were faced with a simlar predicament. I now have two grown children who I love very much.
I consider myself very fortunate that I live in a country that allowed us the right to make that decision without government interference. While I personally do not like the idea of abortion, I feel even stronger about the federal government intervening in peoples personal decision making. I see the concept of stripping a woman of the right to make those decisions as "more governement". As a proponent of "less government", I feel that those are personal decisions are best left to the individual. I certainly am not very comfortable with the federal government making medical or reproductive decisions on behalf of my wife or daughter. If you are personally opposed to abortion, don't have one. I've always felt that forcing ones particular moral agenda to be an activist liberal tenet. I feel the same way about gay marriage and other social conservative issues. It's my family, and it's none of your business how I worship, who I marry, and whatever other decisions we decide to make regarding our lives. I think conservatives have it backwards regarding these issues. My feeling is that they should be more concerned with protecting the individuals ability to make their own decisions, and less concerned with using the federal government as an instrument of social change.
The Blog: A compendium of thoughts on politics, world affairs, economics, pop culture and social issues, from the center right perspective of me--Bryan McGrath--a University of Virginia graduate who spent a career in the world's greatest Navy keeping my mouth shut about politics and social issues (ok, publicly keeping it shut). Those days are over! Pull up a chair and chime in where you will. Keep it clean, civil, concise and relevant.
The Fish: The fish is a "coat of arms" for the blog, symbolizing three formative influences in the life of the blog founder. The first is his experience at the University of Virginia--symbolized most importantly by the fish itself, or a caricature of a "Wahoo", the fish we have acquired as an informal nickname. Additionally there is the sword, the sword of a Cavalier. It is not wielded in a threatening manner, as this is a civil blog. But it is there, should it be needed. Thirdly, there is the influence of 21 years in the Navy--symbolized by the anchor on the Wahoo's fin (and again, the sword) . Finally, there is the bowler, tuxedo, and monocle, symbols of a refined, intellectual conservatism, or what I seek to encourage here.
The Policy: I take FULL responsibility for what I write. I will not be held responsible for the content of my comments section--as long as it is civil and passes my own inscrutable sniff tests, it will appear. If the comment offends you, that is on you.
Feedjit
Follow Me:
On Twitter at ConsWahoo On Facebook at "Fans of The Conservative Wahoo"
4 comments:
That's what they're going to run on from here on out, social issues, immigration, anything but the economy. And it might work.
They're trying to mitigate the pain of unemployment with extension after extension of benefits (my State has borrowed 2 billion plus for that very thing) but they're just kicking the can down the road.
I'm not sure how I feel about the midterms. If the Republicans do very well, and we start to see sane fiscal policy and an improved economy, Obama like Clinton could get the credit. I want socialism once and for all discredited with the brain-dead, any breeze will sway you, moderates (otherwise know as fools, idiots and no-nothings)!
Dionne pretty much nails my position on social issues and conservative philosphy. Kudo's for posting it. I've never really understood the conservtives postion on things such as family values, gay marriage or abortion. And it seems as if every day brings out another "one man, one woman" politician who does not fully comprehend the "one woman" part of that ideology.
Ok Anonymous, make your best case for abortion on demand. Let's hear it.
Ok, here is my spin.
When my wife became pregnant with my daughter she was 22 years old, working, and still in college. We were neither financially nor emotionally prepared for a newborn. Ultimately we choose to have a baby, and take on all of the responsibility that came along with it.
It was the most difficult decision we have ever had to make. Two years later we were faced with a simlar predicament. I now have two grown children who I love very much.
I consider myself very fortunate that I live in a country that allowed us the right to make that decision without government interference. While I personally do not like the idea of abortion, I feel even stronger about the federal government intervening in peoples personal decision making. I see the concept of stripping a woman of the right to make those decisions as "more governement". As a proponent of "less government", I feel that those are personal decisions are best left to the individual. I certainly am not very comfortable with the federal government making medical or reproductive decisions on behalf of my wife or daughter. If you are personally opposed to abortion, don't have one. I've always felt that forcing ones particular moral agenda to be an activist liberal tenet. I feel the same way about gay marriage and other social conservative issues. It's my family, and it's none of your business how I worship, who I marry, and whatever other decisions we decide to make regarding our lives. I think conservatives have it backwards regarding these issues. My feeling is that they should be more concerned with protecting the individuals ability to make their own decisions, and less concerned with using the federal government as an instrument of social change.
Post a Comment